Mine eyes have seen a picture of Anthony Weiner’s cock:
He should have kept it in his pants wrapped inside a cotton sock;
If he’s going to leave it out that way, he should rub it with sun block
A penis is in the news!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
A penis is in the news!
Republicans in Congress say that Weiner must resign;
His sexual behavior ‘tis not pure like yours and mine;
But David Vitter’s use of hookers they say, with them is mighty fine!
Hypocrisy marches on!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Hypocrisy marches on!
Don’t think with your penis is advice men must obey;
It will keep us out of prison and helps us get through the day.
Anthony forgot this, but in congress he should stay!
His penis doesn’t dictate his vote!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
His penis doesn’t dictate his vote!
Many, if not most or even all, men compartmentalize their sexual fantasies and behavior. That is how “family values” politicians, those who take strong moral stances against homosexual marriage and other forms of behavior which, to their minds, is immoral are capable of behaving in ways that would make a satyr blush. (Senator John Ensign—who resigned recently just as it was clear the Senate Ethics Committee was apt to recommend his expulsion from the Senate, and Senator David Vitter, who is still embraced by the Republican Party, are two recent examples.
This compartmentalization allows men such as Ensign and Vitter to keep from gagging at the site of their own reflections in the mirror and permits men to function rationally in mixed sex workplaces. It is this sexual compartmentalization that has kept the US House and Senate—which have historically been almost all male—from voting to require women’s ID pictures to be taken in the nude—full frontal preferably. Were it not for the compartmentalization of the male sex drive, I guarantee such a bill could garner substantial bipartisan support.
This compartmentalization of the male sexual identity also allows a man’s sexual proclivities and peccadilloes have little effect on his judgment and reasoning in other areas. This means we should not over generalize from a man’s failings stemming from his sexual behavior. That Anthony Weiner, John Ensign, and David Vitter showed poor judgment around sexual behavior, does not mean their judgment was poor in other areas.
Undeniably in the case of David Vitter, and likely in the case of John Ensign, the inability to inhibit unacceptable sexual urges may lead a man into breaking the law, which should be a border that elected officials refuse to cross—even when thinking with their penises. Anthony Weiner’s behavior, although creepy and outside our social norms, remained legal as far as we know.
True, when caught, Anthony Weiner did lie to us all, but if we were to make that a criterion for remaining in Congress, every Congressman who pretends to believe that lowering taxes on the wealthy will lead to job growth would have to resign immediately. That is a lie which threatens to screw our economy, and that is sexual behavior far worse than Weiner’s.